This study sought to determine the difficulties of fourth year high school students in solving problems in Physics.

          This study is a diagnostic-illuminative type. It was intended to reveal conceptual or procedural errors that students commit in solving word problems in high school Physics. To achieve this end, the researcher used the survey method of gathering information. In this method, all fourth year students of the two schools, SSPSC Tagbina and SSPSC Lianga, were asked to respond to a Diagnostic Test prepared by the author.

           The test was divided into 4 levels, level 1, understanding what is asked in the problems that measure the reading comprehension skills of students; Level 2, measuring the student’s skills in translating unknown into mathematical expression; and level 3 measuring the student’s skills in formulating mathematical equation that expresses the relation of he variables in the problem; lastly, in Level 4, solving problems involving linear equation, quadratic and exponential equation.

          The statistical tools used in analyzing the data were means and z-test.

1. The study found out that most students understood what is asked in the problem. The results revealed that out of 130 students who took the diagnostic test, there were 76 students who passed level 1 question.
2. In level 2 questions, students found difficulty in translating unknown into mathematical expression. There were only 44 students out of 130 who passed. 
3. In formulating mathematical equation that expresses the relation of the variables in the problem for level 3 questions, many students did not answer correctly and only 53 students passed this level.
4. In level 4, students found it most difficult in solving problems which consisted of three different types of worded problems, linear equation, quadratic equation and exponential equation problems. The results of the test revealed that most of the students found it most difficult in solving worded problems involving quadratic equation and exponential equation. Out of 130 students, 38 passed this level.
5. The study also found out that there was a significant difference between the proportion of students who passed level 1, level 3 and level 4 question of SSPSC-Tagbina Campus and the proportion of students who passed level 1 , level 3, and level 4 questions. For the level 2 question, there was no significant difference between the proportions.

From the above findings, the following conclusions were drawn:

1. The students were not prepared or equipped to take Physics subject. They lacked mathematical skillswhich are needed in solving worded problems.
2. Many students could not solve worded problem because they could not translate unknown into mathematical expression and formulate mathematical equation that expresses the relation of the variables in the problem.
3. The students found it most difficult in solving worded problems involving quadratic and exponential equations.The results also indicated that the higher the level of questions the more is the increase of the level of difficulty.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings the recommendations are prescribed:

1. The findings of the study may be made known to students, teachers of Physics, teachers in mathematics, teachers in English, principals, supervisors for their information and guidance.
2. Although there was a greater number of students who passed level 1 questions, it is then, suggested that there must be a remedial class for English subjects, because there was still a proportion of the students who could not comprehend the problems thoroughly.
3. To the second year mathematics teachers, it is suggested that they give more emphasis on mathematics sentences, inequalities, as to provide students basic knowledge in translating into mathematical expression in preparation for solving worded problems. Furthermore, it is also suggested that they give equal weight of timed in taking up problems with the following types: linear equations, quadratic equations and exponential expression.
4. It is recommended that the Physics teacher spend more time, effort, intellect and patience in teaching the subject.
5. This study is confined to its own limitations; it is therefore recommended that further researches that involve all the topics in fourth year high school physics curriculum be undertaken 
6. The researcher recommends further study to find out if there is a significant difference in the students’ performance in physics between male and female.
7. Further study be conducted to find out if the educational attainment of parents is one of the factors that affect students’ performance.

Kelly, William A. Educational Psychology. Philippines: Edca Publishing and Distributing Corporation,1993.

Salmorin, Lolita M. et. al. Science and technology Physics. Quezon City: Abida Publishing House, Inc.1995.Unpublished Materials

Calugan, Bangasan. “Percieved Difficulties of senior Physics Students in the Secondary Schools.” Thesis. St. Louis University, Baguio City. Nov. 1988.

Cristobal, Ruby. “Government bares Science Education Plan for 2001-2005” S&T POST Vol .XVII No.12 Dec. 2001, 1.

Geronimo, Marites. “The Effects of Integration of Mathematics and Physics Concepts on the Physics Achievement of Fourth Year high school students of Isabela National High School”. Thesis. Philippines Normal University Graduate College, Manila, 1988.

Moises, Meden. “ The effects of Mathematics Review on the Learning of High School Chemistry and in Problem Solving”. Thesis. Capiz National High School. Capiz. Roxas City, 1994

Navarro, Murray Saturnino Fernando. “Effects of mathematical Support to the CONSTEL telecourse in Physics Teachers Learning and Lesson Presentation”. Dissertation. U.P. College of Education, Diliman, Quezon City, 1998

Ramones, Marichita. “Factors Related to Students’ Difficulties in Solving Problems in High School in Physics”. Thesis. University of the Philippines College of Education. Diliman, Quezon City

Su, Gregoria T. “ Effects of Starter – Based Experiment Approach in Physics: Performance and Values Development”. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Cebu Normal University, 1999.

Blosser, Patricia. “ Teaching Problem Solving-Secondary School Science”. U.S., Educational Resources Information Center, ERIC/SMEAC Science Education Digest No. 2 ED 309049, 1988.

Britz, Joan. “Problem Solving in Early Childhood Classrooms” U.S. Educational Resources Information Center, ERIC Digest ED 355040, 1993.

Campione, J.C., A. L. Brown, and M.L. Connell. “Metacognition: On the Importance what you are doing” In R.I. Charles & E. A. Siler (Eds), The Teaching Assessing of Mathematical Problem Solving . Reston, VA:

Lawrence Erlbaum, national Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1988.

Charles, R. I., F. K. Lester, and P. O’Daffer. How to Evaluate Progress in Problems Solving. Reston, Virginia: national Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1987.

Geban, Omer., Askar, Petek., Ozkan, Ilker. “ Effects of computer Simulations and Problems-Solving Approaches on High School Students”. Journal of Education Research. Vol. 86 no. 1 (Sept./Oct. 1992).

Koch, Adina., Eckstein, Shulamith. “Skills Needed for Reading Comprehension of Physics Texts and Their relation to Problem-Solving Ability”. Journal of Research Science Teaching, 32, no. 6 (1995). 613-28.

Lankard, Bettina. “Integrating Science and Math in Vocational Education”. U.S., Educational Resources information Center, ERIC Digest ED 355456, 1992

Means, Gladys. “ The influence on Problem-Solving Ability of Following an Efficient Model”. The Journal of Educational Research, 62, no. 3 (Nov. 1965).

Piemonte, Charles, “The Crusade for Problem Solving in Mathematics Education”. Condensed Curriculum Review, Vol. XX (June 1981), 220-223.

Russell, Michael., Chiapetta, Eugene. “The Effects of a Problem Solving on the Achievement of Earth Science Students”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 18. no. 4 (1981). 295-01.

Slife, Brent D. et. al. Cook, Ruth. “Development Skills in Solving Problem”. How to build on Natural tendency. Vol. XXI (Sept. 1985) 5-13.

Trismen. D.A. “Hintss: An Aid to Diagnosis in Mathematical Problem Solving” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol 19 (1988). 358-361.

Wilson, James W, Maria L. Fernandez, and Nelda Hadaway. Mathematical Problem Solving. http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/emt725/PSsyn/PSsyn.html

Wood Terry., Sellers, Patricia. “ Deepening the Analysis: Longitudinal Assessment of a Problem-Centered Mathematics Program”. Journal for Research in mathematics Education. 28, no. 2 (1997). 163-164.